|
CoolFilmz.com
|
Movie Reviews
-
Drama and Suspense
|
|
Written by Kevin Meehan
|
|
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 06:20 PM
|
|
After the amazing transformation from book to movie of Cormac McCarthy’s No Country For Old Men by the Coen brothers there was ample reason to hope that another McCarthy novel could be equally successfully adapted. Of course, in the end that ended up not being true of The Road, the post-apocalyptic father and son road trip film starring Viggo Mortensen and Charlize Theron.
In fairness, The Road was not the type of book that naturally lends itself to being made into a film. It contains relatively little action and scant amounts of dialogue. The bulk of the story is Viggo and his son – neither of whom are given names – walking along a road (go figure) scrounging for food and trying to find shelter, at least temporarily, while hoping not to run into the more dangerous vagabonds traveling along the same road. They have their share of luck both good and bad. From encounters with jerks who threaten their lives and flip their precious shopping cart to the discovery of an underground bunker full of non-perishable food items and a well-placed Coke machine, there were several moments of conflict; just not enough to keep an audience entertained.
These adventures are interspersed with flashbacks of Viggo’s time with his now deceased wife – Theron’s also-unnamed character – from before shit-hit-the-fan and man and son had to set out towards the ocean for some unclear reason. Such scenes had to be added and elongated for the film because there weren’t all that many in the book and, as we all know any film needs a strong female lead. That might have been the first clue that maybe this film was left better off in print form alone. Another reason is that anyone who read the book – which is a very large group of people – knew right off the bat that it would in no way be equaled as a film. Surely the filmmakers counted on pure curiosity from people wondering how the film would turn out to get them some sort of respectable draw at the box office. But really, this film, like so many other novels-cum-films, paled greatly in comparison with the original work.
It’s oftentimes said that a picture is worth a thousand words. That very well may be true, but perhaps not necessarily when it comes to on-screen adaptations of works of literature. A book like The Road, in which there’s not a whole lot of action, gains popularity because of the words themselves. The author’s use of imagery, tone and any and all other literary elements as well as the attention to detail allowed in each paragraph and sentence is what truly sets a work apart. A picture may be worth a thousand words but when it comes to putting pictures to what is written on a page, the exact words are rarely if ever captured.
|
You need to login or register to post comments. Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)
|
Law Abiding Citizen (2009)
|
|
|
|
|
Movie Reviews
-
Thriller and Action
|
|
Written by Matthew J. DeReno
|
|
Friday, August 06, 2010 11:54 AM
|
|
Law Abiding Citizen is a somewhat outlandish thriller but I liked it. It was well-acted and carried out its sometimes silly plot with conviction. Ah, conviction, an operative word in Law Abiding Citizen.
The film stars Jaimie Foxx as a prosecuting attorney Nick Rice. However, before we even get to know rice, we witness a brutal crime. Gerard Butler is Clyde Shelton, a man opening the door to his house when he is hit square in the face with a baseball bat. His wife is then raped and murdered. He somehow lives. Later, Nick Rice is prosecuting the thugs that murdered his family and to ensure his 96-percent conviction rate, cuts a deal to send one of the accused to death row while the other gets a lesser degree murder rape rap. Rice assures Shelton this is their only option because the case is not air tight. After all, since Shelton passed out his testimony will be of no help. Shelton is furious and he fumes. Cut to ten years later. Rice is enjoying the success of his career. Shelton, meanwhile, launches into a scheme to kill the man who killed his family. How this is done is quite gruesome and shows us that Shelton, despite our sympathy for him, clearly is wiling to go overboard in exacting his revenge. Okay, I will tell you: he dismembers Darby, one of the men responsible for killing his family. Only he does it by first injecting him with Puffer fish toxin that keeps him alert yet paralyzed. Darby awakes to fin himself strapped to a table. Shelton then pumps adrenaline into him intravenously so the man will not pass out as his limbs are being removed. Is he happy now? No. How he seeks revenge on the entire justice system, which includes Rice. Slowly Shelton is able to kill many people in the justice system, including attorneys, judges, legal counsel and inmates, all from his jail cell. After all, he let himself be caught. Is Rice next? Is he saving him for last? Perhaps. Nevertheless, Rice is going to fight back. In his way are several clever ploys on the part of Shelton to kill basically the whole justice department. Or, are these ideas merely over the top? I mean Shelton employs a drone to kill a bunch of people at a funeral. Plus, Shelton is seemingly is the toughest guy that ever lived. We learn why - at least plausibly why in Law Abiding Citizen he is so tough. He is ex-CIA, trained to kill people with unorthodox ways. Okay. I'll buy that. But, jeez, how come we are still fighting in Afghanistan with guys like Shelton on our side? I mean he can literally kill an entire governmental arm all from within his jail cell? Yet, can't get all those enemies in Afghanistan? I won't harp on the incredible chain of events that must go precisely right so Shelton can carry out his revenge. I will say that law Abiding Citizen is a well done and well acted thriller. It's a film where since the actors believe what they are doing, we do too. A bit over the top, yes, but I was entertained and bad guys were killed creatively. Isn't that what CoolFilmz.com is all about? Wait a second... I think there is a drone parked around the corner.
|
You need to login or register to post comments. Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)
|
|
Unspooled: Titanic - A Tale of Two Movies
|
|
|
|
|
Blog
-
Unspooled
|
|
Written by Matthew J. DeReno
|
|
Monday, July 12, 2010 11:36 AM
|
|
I sat through Titanic with the family the other day. It's been a while since I saw it and I thought maybe I should give it a fresh chance since it is now properly distanced from the hoopla that surrounded its initial release in 1997. I wasn't much into romantic epics at the time, and I am not now. But, this movie does feature a major shipwreck, so it has that built in appeal. James Cameron's Titanic is the classic Hollywood blockbuster for sure. Perhaps it is even the Gone With the Wind of 1990s (I don't think we had one for the 2000s). It is a very chic flick movie for the most part and hence I am not going to really give the full CoolFilmz treatment or look at it from that angle. This movie is an orange and we review apples. Still, I love history and on that note Titanic is a great historical film. Plus, I love to see big stuff go down, blow up, explode, catch on fire. In that regards, Titanic scores very well. Except, you have to wait patiently until all the girls have all the fun with the love story, which dominates the first half of the film. A good friend of mine summed it up perfectly. The first half of the movie is for the women. The second half is for guys. I would have to agree. Now, in terms of how I feel about the movie overall, I am reminded of Joe Pesci in Goodfellas when they were discussing how good a certain singer was and he said, "The man's a good singer. Let's leave it at that." Titanic is a good movie. Let's leave it at that.
|
You need to login or register to post comments. Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)
|
Movie Reviews
-
Horror and Gore
|
|
Written by Matthew J. DeReno
|
|
Sunday, July 11, 2010 05:37 PM
|
Pet Sematary is campy, yet somehow strangely entertaining flick bordering on total schlock and a complete waste of time. It is not a good haunted house flick, but it is entertaining. There is something of Stephen King’s trademark touches on the movie, which saves it from total collapse (as well there should be, since he wrote the screenplay as well as the book this film is based upon). The presence of legendary actor Fred Gwynne (a.k.a. Herman Munster) really helped rescue it from total failure as well.
As the film opens, a new family is arriving in a rural Maine town. Quite an original opening for a haunted house film, eh? The father of the family is Louis Creed (Midkiff), an MD, who is relocating his tribe here to become the new town doctor. The Creeds settle on a house that is by the side of a dangerous road (and not a friend to man). Foreshadowing is quite heavy as large powerful trucks race along this highway.
|
|
Read more: Pet Sematary (1989)
|
You need to login or register to post comments. Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)
|
Movie Reviews
-
Thriller and Action
|
|
Written by Matthew J. DeReno
|
|
Monday, July 05, 2010 12:55 PM
|
|
There is something wonderfully frightening about films dealing with possible mind control and dual realities. In some sense, you never can quite make out heads from tails. It is like living in the world of the Matrix. Are you really living in reality or merely plugged into the Matrix? There have been all sorts of plays on this false versus so-called real reality and Shutter Island is next in line.
Directed by Martin Scorsese and staring Leonardo DiCaprio as U.S. Marshal Edward "Teddy" Daniels, Shutter Island is a 2010 American psychological thriller film based on Dennis Lehane's 2003 novel of the same name. Daniels is investigating the psychiatric facility on Shutter Island, where we soon learn he suspects all sorts of inhumane Nazi-style mind experiments are taking place. It is a quest for truth and the truth might make us all insane when all the cards are flipped over and we learn the truth of Shutter Island. Shutter Island is a superb psycho-thriller. In an era where vampires should wear panties it is refreshing to see a good hard-ass thriller done the right way. The film is nearly flawless in its presentation of mood and atmosphere. It is like we are watching a haunted house movie only this movie is really dealing with psychiatric wards. The criminally insane are presented with distorted yet somehow real mental disturbances and physical appearances creating a creepy world that is both One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nets and Shawshank Redemption. DiCaprio is an A-list talent who can actually act. He is on the money. From his quick piercing "defense mechanisms" to his shaking hands. At the drop of a dime, he looks ready to attack someone yet conveys with convincing authority the aura of an accomplished lawman. The supporting cast is perfectly imagined. Ben Kingsley is Dr. John Crawley, a seemingly morose yet intelligent and weird doctor-type who runs the programs at Shutter Island. Mark Ruffalo is U.S. Marshal Chuck Aule. As the film opens, Aule is assigned to Daniels as his new partner. It is through Aule, that we soon learn of Daniels' ulterior reason for taking the assignment at Shutter Island. Daniels is convinced that the arsonist that set his house on fire, thus killing his wife, was eventually housed and locked away at Shutter Island. Through another ex-institutionalized patent, he comes to believe that Nazi style experiments are being conducted in the light house at Shutter Island. Well, in a way he is right - the controversial treatment of the lobotomy, which was in its full hey day in the after math of World War II, was a treatment that took place in the Light House. In case you don't know, a lobotomy is "cure' where they drill into your head and scrape away at your brain until you are healed. Many claim it simply created mindless drooling vegetables and the practice soon gave way to psychotherapy drugs. As Daniels begins to learn and suspect more and more on his quest for the truth at Shutter Island, it just may be that the truth is more horrifying than he could possibly imagine. Slowly and quite unsettling, Daniels begins to resemble many of the very patients that are institutionalized on the Island. He begins to doubt his partner. He begins to doubt his own reality. We begin to wonder too. The only thing that seems absolutely certain is one thing: this film is an Ace.
|
You need to login or register to post comments. Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)
|
Unspooled: I saw Eclipse - Where do I mail the man card?
|
|
|
|
|
Blog
-
Unspooled
|
|
Written by Matthew J. DeReno
|
|
Monday, July 05, 2010 04:39 AM
|
|
Yesterday I sat through Eclipse on the big silver screen. The biggest question I have: where do I mail my man card? Of lesser concern are these questions: can someone pound a stake through my heart? Shoot me with a silver screen bullet? I might ask one of these vampires in the movie to do so, but they might just kiss me instead.
|
|
Read more: Unspooled: I saw Eclipse - Where do I mail the man card?
|
You need to login or register to post comments. Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 18 |
|